Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> And once again HN claims to be rational...

If you have an alternative theory as to why people prefer coal to nuclear, that would be useful. Commenting line by line with silliness isn't.



Or just renewables with storage? Why must the alternative always be fossil fuels?


That seems not relevant to my point, which is that semi-namecalling commentary is pointless. If you have a real point of any sort that would be better be it addressing the point that people prefer coal to nuclear, or changing the topic to "why oh why can't we offer an alternative base load generator?"




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: