If I were a judge, I hopefully would realize that this was about more than the specific implications of the present program. This is question of who can make claims to who. If the Executive can say to the Judiciary, "This will hurt people." I (as a judge) should have the power to say, "I don't trust you, so let's hear arguments from another point of view."

Trust is something a balanced and representative government should not rely on. The ruling in this case is an acquiescence of power from the Judiciary to the Executive.