Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

No, he did a great job of explaining that it's not one or the other, which is what the earlier comment quite blatantly made a claim of.


No they didn't.

They narrowly defined a word that has many definitions while demonstrating outrage at any other meaning.

While they are technically correct in a textbook sense, their idea of a "True" free market has never existed in the context of this conversation, and it can be argued that price collusion between suppliers for a market is the natural result of free markets.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: