Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Speaking about sleep in terms of debt is somewhat misleading. A sleep deficit can't be "paid off" as you might pay off a financial obligation. If you overdraw from a checking account, you can settle up by making one larger-than-usual deposit. If you stay awake for three days, then sleep much longer than usual doesn't give you a full cognitive recovery. It might be more accurate to think of staying awake as taking out a loan with very high interest.

EDIT: This is a difficult concept to understand because it sounds like a semantic difference. Here's an interesting article that explains it in more detail:

http://www.npr.org/2013/08/15/212276021/of-neurons-and-memor...



On the other hand, if you get 50 hours behind on sleep, you only need a handful of extra hours to get back to normal.

It's both better and worse than actual numerical debt. Paying it off is painful and slow, but you don't have to pay off the original amount.


Well, not really. During the time where you're building up those 50 'lost hours', your body is performing worse. What you owe in sleep you'll (immediately) pay for in reduced quality of wakefulness: lower mental acuity, worse immune system, poorer physical performance, slower recuperation, etc.

Nature only barters, not lends.


Your reply is what I was hoping to see when I saw the title of this post.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: