Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

All I can think of is a subscription-based model that would aggregate all of the URLs and give you stats on it. Like, $5/mo for a URL shortener that lets you see how much something has been clicked on, who clicked, when, and so on. This would also serve as a history of shortened URLs.

But really something like this is probably best rolled into the services that require them, like Twitter. Twitter should provide it, I think.



Bit.ly offers this functionality, for free.

I think bit.ly are the only ones that have a chance of making real money. Their model is:

1. Build a very good URL shortening service

2. Have a close relationship with Twitter, get them to choose you as their URL shortener

3. Hope Twitter will get bought and then buy you, like they bought Summize for search.


Models that are based on "hope I get bought out" are not viable imo. All business plans are obviously dependent on certain favorable conditions (like finding customers), but it's a lot easier to find some customers than it is to convince one of the very few potential acquirers to first acquire a business that provides your functions and then second to acquire you instead of a competitor.


Absolutely. I was being at least partly sarcastic here ;)

The funny thing about bit.ly is that they take this model to the next level - they are actually building to be bought by a specific company which has yet to make any income itself.

On the other hand, bit.ly's investors have a lot of pull in Twitter, so it's a unique situation. I don't know enough about VC investments to tell, but the situation where investors in X create Y in order for it to be bought by X - obviously with some profit - is pretty interesting.


IIRC, the same investors that own Twitter also own bit.ly.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: