Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Protecting people from themselves has plenty of precedents - food industry, handrails...

Regarding your second point: Many things that are not embarrassing or compromising (in a negative sense) are rightfully kept secret.

Anyways, great topic, not so great subthread, I'm out.



"Many things that are not embarrassing or compromising (in a negative sense) are rightfully kept secret."

I don't intend any negative sense, just things that you have a particular reason to keep hidden. Allowing additional inference around that by being selective about channels seems like poor privacy practice.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: