Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I agree with those hypothetical possibilities. The other type of failure is also possible.

My dad recently had a detached retina. He spent 5 hours getting his own medical records. In the medical records, it said he was given a dose of Cipro. "Which is funny because I am deathly allergic to Cipro, and since I am alive I certainly wasn't given Cipro."

Had he not spent 5 hours getting medical records and writing letters, some future doctor could easily kill him based on that erroneous medical record. Other than retired people, who has the time to penetrate the HIPAA mess. It can be lifesaving.



I think it is easier to make private information public, than it is to make public information private.

We can mitigate that sort of failure with things like medical bracelets (http://www.mediband.co.uk/). Paramedics check for medical bracelet, necklace and wallet information cards. One of the first words any medical staff will ask is about allergies.

I recognize that that is hardly ideal and indeed some lives are undoubtedly lost because of it. But I think going public with medical records is too far.


Fully public is clearly too far. I just wish I could access my medical records like I access my own email.

As far as I understand, HIPAA regulations make this illegal to even think about. That is what I mean by "extreme".


> I just wish I could access my medical records like I access my own email.

Why do you think you can't? They can't actually be sent to you over unsecured email, but they certainly can be provided to you securely, and the access methods can be very similar to what you would do with email. I don't think anyone offers a data dump rather than a UI into a hosted product, but I don't see any legal reason under HIPAA for that.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: