I never said it wasn't.
> And a breakthrough in P?=NP could have implications for factorization.
Indeed, but what's implied in the article is that they might have made a breakthrough in factorization specifically, not in fundamental CS theory at large.
I never said it wasn't.
> And a breakthrough in P?=NP could have implications for factorization.
Indeed, but what's implied in the article is that they might have made a breakthrough in factorization specifically, not in fundamental CS theory at large.