Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Again, you make no sense. No one attacked the "mere existence" of alternative theories. I challenged you to explain why yours is any more credible than others, something which you apparently cannot do, hence your little tirade about what HN is all about.

And, I plainly I didn't "shoot the mesenger". I specifically questioned your message. In fact, you acknowledged this in your previous reply when you "found it remarkable how thouroughly I have tried to refute your simple statement of an alternative scenario". See that? You acknowledged that I was attacking the statement (i.e. message).

And again with the meta-talk. You have still said nothing in defense of your actual post (calling mine "noisy nonsense" doesn't qualify). Instead, you appear to just be saying things that you hope will get you upvotes.

Contrary to what you have declared HN to be in your quest for karma as its self-appointed keeper, I believe what makes it special is the many bright people here who speak a common language, and who sometimes disagree (even vehemently). But, they are able to construct logic-based, thoughtful arguments, which challenge their adversaries and make them think. I have learned much in this way, as I am sure have others.

Here, however, this is not the case. Sadly.



Edit your noise to about 1/5th the volume and it might be worth skimming. Your prattle is boring.


Thanks for the advice. Will try to be more concise.

Meantime, work on defending your position and constructing logical responses. I should warn you however, that constructing arguments may require that your word volume increases.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: