Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

[flagged]


https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=43675045 (showdead on)

> This is really over for anyone who opposes us. The Lord saved Donald Trump from assassination and is using him as His instrument. The cognitive dissonance to continue to resist the Will of God and will of the people which are united, is just pure bitterness of loss and defeat.

Let's be honest, you aren't gonna believe video, either. It's a matter of literal religious faith for you.


How or why people tie a religion centered around the brown jewish dude in Palestine who advocated for the poor, the sick, the needy, the disabled, and immigrants....with a fat pedophile who wears orange makeup is just strange to me.


[flagged]


Banger tweet there, happy for you, or sorry that happened!


I wish that post hadn't been flagged. It's pretty fucking terrifying reading what some of these MAGAs believe and it should be highlighted. The amount of comments praising the Lord and hailing Trump as some savior Messiah when he was elected is extremely disturbing.


[flagged]


> Laughable for you to suggest that I'm the one with the ideological bent.

I'm hardly suggesting it.

> recovering from internal bleeding in his chest

Guy had a bruise.

https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation/2026/01/14/ice-ag...

"Internal bleeding covers a wide range of severity, from minor bruising to life-threatening injuries… The day after the fatal Jan. 7 shooting, DHS Secretary Kristi Noem told reporters Ross had been taken to the hospital, but he was released and home with family... DHS declined to answer USA TODAY's additional questions about the injury."


[flagged]


> I actually don't have an ideological bent…

This works better if we can't see your posts.

> you assume the officer's injuries are minor.. First, you don't know that.

I do know that, as he was released from the hospital same day.


[flagged]


> My "ideology" is submission to the Creator. It's not "my" ideology.

> You have your ideology though. Though it's not really yours at all…

Aww, we're twinsies!


You really do not add much value to any conversation you're a part of. The reading comprehension just isn't there. It remains true, my views are gained from submission to my faith. I recognize they're not my views. It's submission to our higher power. The difference is that you think your views are yours. But you're a moral relativist being manipulated. Blowing with the wind in society, you're a "cool guy". Anything goes. You wouldn't want to rock the boat on the latest thing coming out of your tribe, now would you. You might have to man up and be uncomfortable, taking an actual counter-cultural stand for once. Not happening Chris.


For anyone who wants a term to refer to this seemingly nonsensical behavior:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Psychological_projection


Pathetic. You guys really don’t have anything to say, do you. Pure feelings, pure emotions.


This is just more of the same. These things you accuse others of are simply your own insecurities. Every single word, at least in these last two comments.


Who here has said anything of substance in response to anything I've said? Not you. You're not countering anything I said, offering no new information, not even offering a counterpoint to anything. Just pure ad hominins. Yes, it's absolutely pathetic and not uncommon anymore. You're just neffing and signaling that you dislike my position and views. Too bad. Talking about insecurity. That's the only "more of the same" going on here.


> Who here has said anything of substance in response to anything I've said?

What have you written that is substantive? It appears your comments in this thread are all meta descriptions of themselves. That is what I refer to as a "psychological projection".


I said more of substance here than you for sure. At least I had a point. You’re just attacking the messenger. Totally useless.


> I said more of substance here than you for sure. At least I had a point.

Your comments do not make any substantive points. One observation with regard to this is that, when asked for anything you've written in this thread that is substantive, you write only that it exists rather than offering said substance for review.

> You’re just attacking the messenger.

My comments are not about you but instead about the things you've posted and your seeming behavior while doing so. I have no quarrel with you.


Wow, talk about projecting.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: