Exactly. If the author says "parts of the article was written by AI", that's probably it, nobody will waste any more time on this because this is what the author has decided to do.

But instead the author seems to hide the fact of using AI under the discussion where some people find it distasteful to use AI. That doesn't help.

You are the one with the problem, not me.

I suggest you reread, I am very transparent about how I used AI in the very thread to which you are replying claiming that I am denying using AI.

You’re not being transparent. When I called you out on using AI for writing the copy, you responded with:

“I used AI to analyze the log for patterns and to make the charts.”

Which is very, very much suggesting you only used AI for that.

Later, you admitted you used AI to rewrite your article.

That’s not being very transparent at all.