Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don't know, but I have substantial evidence:

1) I know that I have emotions because I experience them.

2) I know that you and I are very similar because we are both human.

3) I know that we can observe changes in the brain as a result of our changing emotions and that changes to our brains can affect our emotions.

I thus have good reason to believe that since I experience emotions and that we are both human, you experience emotions too.

The alternative explanation, that you are otherwise human and display all the hallmarks of having emotions but do not in fact experience anything (the P-zombie hypothesis), is an extraordinary claim that has no evidence to support it and not even a plausible, hypothetical mechanism of action.

With an emotional machine I see no immediately obvious even hypothetical evidence to lend support to its veracity. In light of all this, it seems extraordinary to claim that non-biological means achieving real emotions (not emulated emotions) are possible.

After all, emulated emotions have already been demonstrated in video games. To call those sufficient would be setting an extremely low bar.



Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: