Are you russian by any chance? Or just deeply, irredeemably brainwashed?
> Not that it was illegal
Yes it was.
> Not sure I believe the press either side over civilian exodus vs evacuations
Straying into conspiracy territory again, unsurprisingly.
> And as a nice bonus a demilitarised zone
Ah, you mean a DMZ in Bryansk, Kursk, Belgorod, and so on, down the internationally recognised border? Somehow, I don't think you do.
> With regards to land, imo that's unfortunately best either traded for goods or leave it as is
Surprise, surprise. You want to give the terrorists everything they want.
> no NATO
That's not for you or russia to determine. And this was never about NATO anyway, given that NATO has been on russia's immediate land border for decades already. The narrative about NATO is yet more kremlin bullshit that you not only believe, but propagate here.
> elections
The Ukrainian opposition parties don't want this, so why do you? Zelensky's approval rating is through the roof. Ukrainians trust Zelensky. He is a true hero.
> As for EU protections Russia never used to object to that but the name calling may have changed their minds.
Oh really? The EU are now the bad guys for saying mean things? Oh goodness, poor russia. My heart truly bleeds. Yes, I can now understand why they've killed hundreds of thousands of people, tortured people, raped people, stolen children, levelled entire cities, displaced millions. Yes, yes. How dare we say mean things.
---
Honestly, I find you disgusting. This discussion is over.
My original and edited comment stands. You can resort to name-calling that's your prerogative, or you can engage like an adult seeing a solution to a problem.
I'm not insulting you by saying that, but you're clearly very emotionally invested and might benefit from distance if claiming to have a solution to a problem.
Are you russian by any chance? Or just deeply, irredeemably brainwashed?
> Not that it was illegal
Yes it was.
> Not sure I believe the press either side over civilian exodus vs evacuations
Straying into conspiracy territory again, unsurprisingly.
> And as a nice bonus a demilitarised zone
Ah, you mean a DMZ in Bryansk, Kursk, Belgorod, and so on, down the internationally recognised border? Somehow, I don't think you do.
> With regards to land, imo that's unfortunately best either traded for goods or leave it as is
Surprise, surprise. You want to give the terrorists everything they want.
> no NATO
That's not for you or russia to determine. And this was never about NATO anyway, given that NATO has been on russia's immediate land border for decades already. The narrative about NATO is yet more kremlin bullshit that you not only believe, but propagate here.
> elections
The Ukrainian opposition parties don't want this, so why do you? Zelensky's approval rating is through the roof. Ukrainians trust Zelensky. He is a true hero.
> As for EU protections Russia never used to object to that but the name calling may have changed their minds.
Oh really? The EU are now the bad guys for saying mean things? Oh goodness, poor russia. My heart truly bleeds. Yes, I can now understand why they've killed hundreds of thousands of people, tortured people, raped people, stolen children, levelled entire cities, displaced millions. Yes, yes. How dare we say mean things.
---
Honestly, I find you disgusting. This discussion is over.