Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"What can I do, under US law, to minimize what they store about me and my behavior, or at least keep tabs on them?" "...Nothing" "Nonsense, and the article addresses this. 'Block Meta’s Trackers'

The parent said nothing could be done. I say that's nonsense and listed a thing that could be done. You respond it's not nonsense and then list the same thing I mentioned.

I am very confused by your thought process.



I can see where you're coming from.

I'll be honest, when I read the initial comment I interpreted his question to be closer to

"stop Meta from collecting my data to a meaningful degree"

vs how you've interpreted it -

"reduce the amount of data Meta tracks even if only marginally"

That's why the response saying "nothing" made sense to me, because blocking the trackers only has such a minor effect on Metas tracking.


Thank you for explaining, I appreciate it. I could see we were talking past each other, but I wasn't sure how.


Then you have a very easily confused process yourself. They did not make such a declarative statement as you suggest. They just said that blocking them is still a good idea even though it's not going to stop Meta from knowing about you. Being able to see the details in someone's comment is easier when you don't have a preconceived agenda




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: