The burden of evidence is not on me, at some point there is enough overwhelming public evidence for something that the burden of evidence shifts to you to disprove general consensus.

I think it's better to leave the exercise of Googling "evidence of genocide in Gaza" and "history of Israeli-Palestinian conflict" to you, the reader. It will teach you some basic research and inference skills.

Certainly, if I try to link to government and NGO press releases, Wikipedia articles, social media accounts of field press and Palestinians, or news articles, I run a very high risk of you conveniently denouncing my sources as biased before you even try to critically engage with them. It's better that you encounter sources on your own, corroborate them and follow hyperlinks, taking time to really understand the heart of this conflict. There is a lot of geopolitical and economic history coming into play here.

> You’re literally going against the status quo right now — you just aren’t allowed to arbitrarily not pay your taxes

You have a narrow definition of "going against the status quo" which conveniently suits your argument. However, that is clearly not the definition which I used when laying out my argument. It is disingenuous to purport a straw man argument derived from manufactured ambiguity. You know what I mean, do not deflect and devolve into a meta-argument about the meaning of my words.