I hope it gets added, it adds so much safety to the language. Mind you, Go is not a very safe language in general, its type system is pretty loose compared to e.g. Java or Typescript. I don't believe it wants to be though.
It's very clear that the reason these kinds of proposals haven't been accepted has nothing to do with the core team not believing they're important enough, but instead because of the impact that they have on the rest of the language.
Immutability is a fundamental property of a language, it's not something that can be bolted on post-facto in a version update. Go as a language doesn't provide immutability.
It's tough to retrofit new restrictions to old code.
C/c++ code still doesn't have "const" everywhere it could. You have to make the default immutable - write "var" or "mut", not "const" - or it doesn't get used everywhere it should. But that breaks old code.