That's what the topic of the post we are discussing is. He is basically reiterating the point. Which is a good point. And there have been zero good arguments made (as far as I'm aware) to why this fear would be unfounded.
I'm pointing out the irony. The Internet is already saturated with us continually metaphorically JPG compressing original ideas into textual redundancy, with many people having only been exposed to those copies of copies.
