This just seems like a review of previous studies, picking and choosing evidence/previous conclusions from tangentially related investigations. I can’t access the published paper but the article implies this area has been studied before, so I’m confused what this new paper is supposed to contribute. Is it just a literature overview?
I’m interested in getting a cat in the future so I’m interested in a proper study of this.
The article subtitle is a "A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis".
Many good refs define both but [1] is free. As far as how you might think of them [2,3] give context. The exact extent of merit can be debated but these do have merit.
I’m interested in getting a cat in the future so I’m interested in a proper study of this.