> "They control 100% of the Windows market". Perhaps it was?
Kind of. The argument was that since they controlled 100% of Windows, and "coerced" people into using IE (and "coerced" is a kind way of putting it), and Windows was 90% of the desktop market, that shit was bad for everyone.
40% of the mobile market is significant, when you consider that the other 60% isn't held by a single company.
Kind of. The argument was that since they controlled 100% of Windows, and "coerced" people into using IE (and "coerced" is a kind way of putting it), and Windows was 90% of the desktop market, that shit was bad for everyone.
40% of the mobile market is significant, when you consider that the other 60% isn't held by a single company.