There actually are objective facts in this world. Not everything is just the "prevailing views". People who want to debate objective facts are not worth talking to. It's also not worth talking to people who don't engage in good faith. Finally, one's time is finite. Internet randoms don't have an inalienable right to take up anyone's time.
> People who want to debate objective facts are not worth talking to.
Then don’t. But that’s not a “conversation”. That’s just lecturing.
Also: Who is the arbiter of what is, and isn’t “objective” truth? Reasonable people sometimes differ.
Also also: The “truth” in this case was “the word ‘groper’ is always offensive, no matter where it is used”. Which I certainly could see reasonable people disagree with. But nope, that obviously merited a straight block.
