Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Use the toggle to turn off the social stuff then.


I still think it's very poor design that the toggle is:

1 - Completely unlabeled, nor is the icon indicative/clear.

2 - Not sticky. It will turn itself back on, even though this is neither implied nor stated in the UI.

3 - The only way to actually turn it off is to dig into your search settings - what percentage of your users actually know that exists, much less think about looking there?


I'd argue that a user looking to configure the settings of their search, are likely to think about looking in the search settings.


On stickiness: search settings - turn off personalized results.


A UX lesson I learned long ago: If you have to have an option for it then it's a poor design


A UX lesson I just know: It is better to have options than unchangeable defaults.

Another UX lesson: do one thing and do it well. Apparently Google forgot that. I still think it is a great one. And yes, I know it pertains to the function software plays and web empires are a different beast, but I find the poetic irony of the down the rabbit hole fiasco being related to a *nix quib delicious.


I think as a professional it's incredibly useful to have little rules like this that provide a structure out of which to make quick judgements and decisions.

But don't become complacent and let these transform into actual beliefs. There is no quicker way to kill your creativity.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: