Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

The point is that Wikipedia is infinitely more fallible than a mathematical equation.


That doesn't make sense. Math equations are expressions of ideas. They can be fallible as much as anything else. Just because 1+1=3 is an equation doesn't make it true.


Yes of course and Euclid's parallel postulate is a matter of fact in your opinion too?

We use abstractions friend, some are useful often and others are not often used.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: