You said "Given how heavily processed bologna is, I'm going to call bullshit on that" in response to someone who said "the Department of Agriculture is the agency that prohibits this, for reasons related to potential damage to US livestock - African swine fever and foot-and-mouth disease are specifically mentioned."
Why would you say that instead of "bologna is not a vector for african swine fever or foot-and-mouth disease"? What does how heavily processed the bologna have to do with your point, and why did you bring it up if it has nothing to do with it? That's literally the only thing I argued against.