Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Lots can change over the years. Your links are from 2016 - it's not conceivable that in the last 6 years, Amazon has changed some of the implementation?


DynamoDB was already large scale at that time.

The point is: the number of services don't need to scale with the level of demand.


My comment was about " paper fails to acknowledge a FOSS database (once?) underneath it: MySQL/InnoDB (and references it as B-Tree instead)." should have been more clear




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: