> You didn’t offer any valid methodological rebuttal to the study.
On most studies regarding discrimination, HN readers clamor to rebut the methodology. That isn't happening here. Is the study bombproof, or is it possible that confirmation bias is at play?
No. It's because this study used a common methodology widely adopted in the field. It's not like other studies which use simple statistical analyses to attribute group wage differences to discrimination.
On most studies regarding discrimination, HN readers clamor to rebut the methodology. That isn't happening here. Is the study bombproof, or is it possible that confirmation bias is at play?