Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> I mean both will significantly kill people in an accident.

Or, you know, when you literally said that it's no different:

> I assume you drove home after your exhausting day, which according to you is endangering others' lives, so what's different when you do it?

--

> You are saying it's ok to drive home exhausted in a car

Show me where I said that.

YOU are the one who claimed that driving exhausted in a truck is no different from driving exhausted in a car. They are EXTREMELY different. One is SIGNIFICANTLY more likely to end in a death, which is why that one has significantly more regulation, even though driving recklessly is illegal in any case.



>Or, you know, when you literally said that it's no different:

Ok so you are just arguing because you want to be right. I asked what's different. Do you not understand the difference between a statement or a question?

You quoted me as saying I literally said driving tired in a car or truck is no different:

>> I assume you drove home after your exhausting day, which according to you is endangering others' lives, so what's different when you do it?

That's obviously a question. It starts with "what" and ends with a question mark. It can't "literally" be a statement.

>Show me where I said that.

Sorry you completely missed the point I was making. You are using red herrings and I called you out on it by using a red herring.

I'm gonna be done here, you aren't arguing in good faith, so it's a waste of both our time. I know you are going to reply because you just have to have the last word, so be my guest.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: