I vouched for this comment as I believe it has a point: I think decentralised systems in general have a tendency to yield centralised hotspots for convenience and scalability reasons as networks grow, but in the case of blockchains and Ethereum in particular, running a full node (that can provide the functionality of Infura for instance) is becoming extremely infeasible.
I acknowledge that this is still much more decentralised in comparison to status quo but it is important to acknowledge also that it is still not as decentralised as it is marketed to be.
You can run a full node on AWS in a couple of minutes, they've a managed Blockchain service that allows you to create an eth node in literally a few click.
Not sure what's infeasible for you, but to me that sounds pretty reasonable.
If you've the skills just download geth and run it yourself in your own hardware. There are people who do this on a daily basis to mine eth and they're not hackers.
one invokes straw-man and can't recognize when it's being pointed out by example of another, more ridiculous straw-man. sigh.
just stop and think for a second. you don't need to go down this road. drop the initial straw-man and try asking a question if you don't understand what's being argued.
if you're unable to walk back the thread, i'll remind that you were the one who started straw-maning by assuming that i think chainsize alone is the problem with syncing a full node.
stop making assumptions and start asking questions.
Yes, when infura dies - the music stops in eth world. And since lots of other tokens run on eth - music stops for them too. It’s a joke of a “decentralized” system, really.
Edit: don't read this as "when in future Infura dies", this has already happened in the past and huge chunks of crypto world were left stranding.
Centralized much?