Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I have been looking at seaweedfs for a while. I suffer from a pretty bad case of NIH Syndrome, so my gut feeling says I should implement it myself. But seaweed is such a good fit that I should probably just try it.

I especially want to know how well it deals with adding / removing servers, data loss and network instability. The beautiful thing with writing my own solution is that it takes at most 10 minutes to diagnose and fix a problem when it occurs.



I have the same syndrome. But I feel seaweedfs should be easy enough to be picked up. If you have any questions, just let me know.


Hey, I was trying out Seaweed yesterday. I ran into an issue with HTTPS, it seems to be not very well supported at the moment.

I managed to get it running mostly secure, but replication didn't work because the volumes were calling eachother with HTTP instead of HTTPS. The HTTP request is hardcoded here: https://github.com/chrislusf/seaweedfs/blob/43fd11278ef81185... and probably in a lot of other places.

I even tried setting the address of the volume to https in the startup script, but then it makes a request to http://https://volume1.example.com and it still fails.

I also noticed that the master API is still available over HTTP even when HTTPS is enabled. I can make an issue for these things if you want.

These issues are currently the only showstopper for me. I need to have every endpoint on TLS with peer verification enabled. If you can get it fixed I will gladly continue testing seaweedfs and support you on Patreon :-)


You can contribute to it and learn it along the way. Pretty flexible.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: