Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Meta: What do you think about the timestamps on the children comments here? So many/much responses in <1min from the parent comment? GPT-3 manipulation?


That's because it was not submitted when you think it was. The submission came here via the second-chance pool. That means that it was submitted recently, in this case yesterday. It might have gotten a few points and comments at best but did not really catch on. It was deemed interesting enough and moved to the second-chance pool to be automatically put on the frontpage a few hours later again. The process rewrites timestamps as far as I know. You can see it in the list at time of writing this:

https://news.ycombinator.com/pool

(You can also access the second-chance pool via the link labelled "Lists" in the footer of the front page if you do not want to remember it.)


I see that, however I was referring to children comments of the initial comment in this thread, and not the submission itself.


I see a number of subthreads that were all posted 40-41 minutes ago, some with longer comments in them which might be the ones you have noticed. I would bet that these comments were posted before the submission was lifted to the frontpage for a second time. Consequently their timestamps were fudged so that they do not appear to have been posted before the submission time.

If you really care, you might want to ask dang (email hn@ycombinator.com) but I am confident that my explanation is not that far off.


Mine is one of those suspicious comments.

I replied to this article when it was first published yesterday. It looks like the whole thread got copied over when it was posted a second time.

Unless, of course, you think I am GPT-3. Can't rule it out.


Thank you for bringing this up. There are multiple _long_ child comments that were sent under a minute after the post was published. Wild. I would guess it is someone with some sort of an agenda. Although I’m not sure about GPT-3.

EDIT: please see @_Microft's comment above for an explanation of how HN will "pool" threads before coming to a conclusion :)


Yeah, even though it's against the rules to bring this up, which seems to be doing a favor for blatant manipulation (gpt bot or not) like this.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: