Something that I've been wondering about is that maybe team's should decide what their metrics are for the upcoming 3 months and then come back and decide what the new metrics are. At the very least, it becomes a big game about the org then.
Impossible to have 'metric based reviews' at that point. But I think that's fine.
That seems to be how quarterly planning worked in the largest org I've seen inside, though the PM and EM did most of the deciding and execs+board approved/disapproved.
Impossible to have 'metric based reviews' at that point. But I think that's fine.