That doesn’t make sense, given:

> Both parts of this statement are false, at least in languages with unsafe features like Rust or C:

The two languages share these features, which is the whole reason this is being written in the first place.

Unsafe as a language feature is something that was invented by the Rust design team. And I don't think there is much value to this concept.

This is like calling code "ugly" and saying that's a feature.

Pointers are not unsafe.