Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

> very little haskell-specific clarifications

The author mentions at least three Haskell-related companies, such as FP Complete, and says he wants to avoid naming specific people for the time being.



If the only charge is that haskell consulting companies are writing code for cryptocurrency projects, then I have misunderstood the article first time around. I assumed the problem was with developments in the haskell language itself.


Exactly this. The article is not about the Haskell language itself -- i.e. not a rant about technical issues -- but about its community and consulting companies getting (allegedly) entangled with crypto businesses. "Making a deal with the devil".

That's why the author rants about crypto and not about Haskell itself.


I am not sure what is "alleged" about Haskell consultancies getting cryptocurrency money. It is pretty easy to confirm. Both Well-Typed and FP Complete got money from Cardano and posted to their blog what amount to advertisements for Cardano. Google a bit if you care.


"Alleged" as in "the article claims this, but I personally haven't double-checked it so don't want to make my post sound as I myself were sure this was the case". "Alleged" doesn't mean "unfounded".

I've written enough comments on HN to know that if I don't word it this way, someone will inevitably start arguing with me as if the assertion was mine.


"...posted to their blog what amount to advertisements for Cardano."

And that would seem to be exactly what Stephen is complaining about.


It does affect Haskell language itself (GHC anyway). See moomin's comment.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: