Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

"Over the last five months, many venture capital players have raised giant chunks of capital. One Facebook investor, Accel Partners, is about to raise $2 billion for investments in China and the United States, while Bessemer Venture Partners is said to be closing in on $1.5 billion for a new fund. Greylock Partners, Sequoia Capital, Andreessen Horowitz and Kleiner Perkins Caufield & Byers have collectively raised more than $3 billion in the last six months."

I keep people hearing people say things to the effect of "it's not a bubble, because the investment is confined to a small amount of private equity". And I suppose that even rapid, multi-billion dollar growth in VC might be explained exclusively by the irrationality of a few private investors. But is that the likely conclusion here?



Contrary to what one might perceive from reading the recent press, not all capital is flowing towards mobile photo sharing apps.

Cleantech and biotech startups are very capital-intensive.


Biotech investment tanked in 2009, and has barely begun to recover. Every statistic I've seen says that valley software companies are still getting the lion's share of VC investment:

http://www.fiercebiotech.com/story/biotech-vc-investing-grow...

http://www.siliconvalley.com/venture-capital-survey/ci_17416...


From a 2010 report http://www.jointventure.org/images/stories/pdf/2010%20Index-... a relevant graph http://moskalyuk.name/wp-content/uploads/2010/04/image13.png By number of deals you're right, software is huge, but by dollar amounts Better Place and others certainly raised the bar for cleantech just by attracting nine-digit sums.


Both of the articles I linked say that software is the largest VC target by dollars invested.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: