>Sweden has one of the highest death rates in the EU. So they were wrong about their strategy.
There strategy is focused on the long-term. Obviously allowing a higher infection rate is going to lead to more deaths initially, but their argument is that eventually everybody everywhere else will be infected (it will keep coming back), in which case the death toll over the long run is the same.
>They are also basing their strategy on the belief that getting the disease grants immunity, which, according to WHO, there is currently no evidence of.
There's no direct evidence of but it's still incredibly unlikely it's not the case, given what we know of how all similar viruses behave.
There strategy is focused on the long-term. Obviously allowing a higher infection rate is going to lead to more deaths initially, but their argument is that eventually everybody everywhere else will be infected (it will keep coming back), in which case the death toll over the long run is the same.
>They are also basing their strategy on the belief that getting the disease grants immunity, which, according to WHO, there is currently no evidence of.
There's no direct evidence of but it's still incredibly unlikely it's not the case, given what we know of how all similar viruses behave.