Even if it's not a violation of the First Amendment, it's close enough that it flips the responsibility. Now the government needs to continually convince people that it's not a violation.
America is about freedom and limited government. That means some policy options are off the table or treated with extreme skepticism.
It's a violation of basic freedoms, that's true, but it's not one without reason (hence my example). I do agree with you that measures like this require constant justification, as would be the case in any democracy. I do not think that flouting these measures arbitrarily is the best way to achieve this.
Being pretty sure it's not going to end too badly isn't sufficient reason to ignore either restrictions.