Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

Here's an explanation of those needs:

Gtk to Qt - a strange journey https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gGZyVSOnqm0

"Presenter(s): Dirk Hohndel"



It seems this was posted a few times to HN already (I just posted it again: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=20746962). Quite interesting.

Some of the messages:

* Their GTK code became very fragile, such that they did not wanted to touch it anymore, and could not implement new features.

* The GTK community was/is not helpful.

* The Qt community was/is very helpful.

* Qt documentation is much better than GTK.

* The Qt frameworks has more to offer (basic data structures, etc).

* CMake is much nicer and easier to understand than just raw makefiles (but somewhat unrelated to Qt vs GTK).

* The model and view system/framework in both Qt and GTK is somewhat/completely broken.

* Qt Creator makes live easier, compared to Emacs (at least for C++/Qt development).

* Qt is nicely encapsulated, in contrast to GTK.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: