Sure, that is incredibly shady, and doesn't deserve any sort of justification.
But, for the sake of the discussion, I'm purely focusing on common shares that the employee already owns, which means vested options that were already exercised.
Zynga's shady practice was affecting unvested options.
But, for the sake of the discussion, I'm purely focusing on common shares that the employee already owns, which means vested options that were already exercised.
Zynga's shady practice was affecting unvested options.