Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I see nothing indicating that he wouldn't opt to write a compliant DRM plugin at his own cost, or pay for the license or plugin if it were required.


He said the browser cannot be completed because Google won't allow their stuff to be used in an OSS project. It's clear he never countenanced the possibility that * gasp * somebody could deny him access to their software. He might have offered to pay, but the substance is basically the same: he assumed he could get access to somebody else's stuff, when there was no such guarantee (if anything, Google carefully insulating it from Chromium should have been a big hint of things to come).




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: