A news website publishes many articles about hot topics. Is 16 a lot or a littler? Is that more or less than pro-Sanders or anti/pro-Clinton articles? DemocracyNow had nothing to say about that.

Even though a complaint whose only evidence is one hand-assembled image shouldn't be taken seriously as an evidence-backed analysis, here goes:

WaPo's response to that cherry-picking accusation (which included some strange cherries, like "Sanders stands up to Clinton's interruptions" being called a negative story): https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2016/03/08/ha...

and the complaints ignored pro-Sanders and anti-Clintion articles from those same days. https://www.google.com/search?q=site:washingtonpost.com+clin...

Thank you for the extra context. The reality is much less harsh than the article would have me believe.