Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin

I don’t think GP was offering a comparison so much as a related item to check out.

Why would you not recommend code that checks the hashed password against a local DB?

See also the “pwned-passwords-django” process here: https://www.b-list.org/weblog/2018/mar/06/two-new-projects



> Why would you not recommend code that checks the hashed password against a local DB?

I would. In fact that's why I have created a product to do exactly that in an efficient way...

Doing the checks online has too many drawbacks:

- availability: what do you do when the service/API is down or you can't reach it?

- determinism: what works today might not tomorrow

- security/privacy/anonymity: ...

I am just uncomfortable with naive code that makes it barely practical:

- if the dataset isn't pre-processed properly, binary searching through it won't lead to the expected results (and that's not always obvious)

- distributing a 30GB+ file on all the DCs

- binary searching through the dataset at runtime means seeking through 30GB... with a O(log n) complexity... in practice that means a very slow response time that gets exponentially worst with load.

If you pre-process the dataset you might as well do it "properly" and make it usable :p




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: