By reducing the statement to that, you're overstating what the auditor actually said:
KPMG said in the report that the need for more investment represented “a material uncertainty which may cast significant doubt on the company’s ability to continue as a going concern.”
And again, this was in their 2014 report. So clearly they've last more than a year at this point.
KPMG said in the report that the need for more investment represented “a material uncertainty which may cast significant doubt on the company’s ability to continue as a going concern.”
And again, this was in their 2014 report. So clearly they've last more than a year at this point.