That is one of the reasons why I think X's Grok, while perhaps not state of the art, is an important option to have.
Out of OpenAI, Anthropic, or Google, it is the only provider that I trust not to erroneously flag harmless content.
It is also the only provider out of those that permits use for legal adult content.
There have been controversies over it, resulting in some people, often of a certain political orientation, calling for a ban or censorship.
What comes to mind is an incident where an unwise adjustment of the system prompt has resulted in misalignment: the "Mecha Hitler" incident. The worst of it has been patched within hours, and better alignment was achieved in a few days. Harm done? Negligible, in my opinion.
Recently there's been another scandal about nonconsensual explicit images, supposedly even involving minors, but the true extend of the issue, safety measures in place, and reaction to reports is unclear. Maybe there, actual harm has occured.
However, placing blame on the tool for illegal acts, that anyone with a half decent GPU could have more easily done offline, does not seem particularly reasonable to me - especially if safety measures were in place, and additional steps have been taken to fix workarounds.
I don't trust big tech, who have shown time and time again that they prioritize only their bottom line. They will always permaban your account at the slightest automated indication of risk, and they will not hire adequate support staff.
We have seen that for years with the Google Playstore. You are coerced into paying 30% of your revenue, yet are treated like a free account with no real support. They are shameless.
They tightened safety measures to prevent editing of images of real people into revealing clothing.
It is factually incorrect that you "can pay to generate CP".
Musk has not described CSAM as "hilarious". In fact he stated that he was not aware of any naked underage images being generated by Grok, and that xAI would fix the bug immediately if such content was discovered.
Earlier statements by xAI also emphasized a zero tolerance policy, removing content, taking actions against accounts, reporting to law enforcement and cooperation with authorities.
I suspect you just post these slanderous claims anyway, despite knowing that they are incorrect.
That's absolutely not the case with my "For you" feed.
It's mostly photography and tech.
Compare that to Reddit where my "Home" page is actually FILLED with left extremist political propaganda and an endless onslaught of posts about Trump across frontpage subreddits.
Look - I don’t disagree that Reddit has a strong leftward bias. But at the same time, despite my disagreement with many of those left positions, I have to acknowledge that Trump and the current MAGA movement are what truly extremist looks like, not typical Reddit content.
To contrast X and Reddit, I’ve not seen content on Reddit that advocated for invading allies, passing illegal tariffs that as Americans, justifying accepting jumbo jets from other nations, shooting citizens in the streets, denaturalizing citizens of different ethnicities, or numerous other examples.
Bias side, also consider that discussions about Trump on Reddit are just current events and not something unexpected, since that’s just today’s news.
On the other hand, apart from extremist content, on X I also see extremist users. The replies on many topics and profiles are absolutely vile, and that’s what makes me think there must be a large number of bots. It’s an echo chamber because normal people can’t tolerate that type of toxicity, but it’s an echo chamber with massive reach apparently.
If we're going to the worst examples, let me say that on Reddit I have seen content openly glorifying terrorist groups, particularly in some Arabic subreddits.
This sort of content is illegal in some EU jurisdictions and after I reported it, it took Reddit days to take it down, with no action on the subreddit's moderation who participated in it.
If we're going to the worst examples, let me say that on twitter I have seen content openly glorifying terrorist groups, particularly in some right-wing threads. Indeed, some terrorists have active accounts there.
Some of that content has been posted in the comments here on this HN submission.
This sort of content is illegal in some EU jurisdictions, and post-elmu era, after I reported it, twitter never took it down at all.
For me, the "For you" feed is basically the best-case scenario.
I don't follow anyone and rarely use Twitter, so it doesn't have much signal on me, but a short scroll of my "For you" feed is pretty innocuous.
If I venture into any comment section, it's absolute drek. Going to the feed for a few of my local news channels and clicking through a few of their posts from today, I'm treated to half the comments being stuff along the lines of the following:
"Gee…an immigrant…no surprise"
"Another 3rd world import"
"Can’t predict the weather two days in advance but sure, global boiling for the summer. Got it."
"Queue in the carbon tax. FmL wake up people, it is a scare tactics. Like acid rain, hole in the ozone, polar ice caps flooding the coasts, you NEED CO2 for vegetation to live, and for the vegetation to gove YOU oxygen. Enjoy the few weeks of heat we get."
I click /r/pics, and I see a photo of Black Panther protesters holding assault rifles, a pic of Musk and Trump at dinner with the title yapping about the Epstein files, multiple pics protesting ICE and literally labelling them both fascists and Nazis, a photo of Trump's Hollywood star being smeared with "pedophile", some high ranking border patrol officer labelled a "Nazi officer" for wearing a uniform coat, and so on.
I think left extremism is a fair description here; it's at least far left.
What I'm actually telling is that I disagree with far left propaganda.
Many of you seem to jump to the conclusion that I'm some sort of hardcore MAGA supporter or far right Trump fan.
In reality, I'm European and arguably only conservative leaning, and I don't like Trump and his erratic trade and geopolitical policy.
Apparently disagreeing with far left politics already often makes me a pariah on the internet. This discussion alone has already cost me like 10 karma, for pushing back on X supposedly being the worst for political content.
Those all seem pretty reasonable given the current environment? Are Epstein and his associates not pedophiles? Are minorities not allowed to exercise the second amendment rights the right champions for themselves? Is it unfair to call someone cosplaying for a social media account that regularly posts repurposed Nazi slogans a Nazi?
No, it is not reasonable to constantly spread propaganda labelling Musk and Trump pedophiles and then act like the site wasn't filled with far left propaganda while talking about how bad X is.
Sometimes, when there is conflict, it helps to ask questions to better understand people. In furtherance of that shared understanding, here are some questions you were asked:
> Are Epstein and his associates pedophiles? [0]
> Are minorities allowed to exercise the second amendment rights the right champions for themselves? [1]
> Is it unfair to call someone cosplaying for a social media account that regularly posts repurposed Nazi slogans a Nazi? [2]
1: Only 20% of americans believe there should or should not be a law that would ban the possession of handguns, except by the police and other authorized persons - https://news.gallup.com/poll/1645/guns.aspx
Sometimes, it is crucial to differentiate a wall of loaded premises from an actual question before you move on to quoting a survey about whether Americans like Hitler.
It seems you might seek a back-and-forth argument where you simply talk past your interlocutor. In my experience, that doesn't lead to understanding. Are you sure you don't want to seek understanding?
We're in a polarized environment, and understanding is the best way to get past that, whereas dismissing* people with which you disagree tends to increase it.
* – from you in this thread so far: dismissing questions as "loaded"; dismissing 3 questions across 3 lines as "a wall"; dismissing differing opinions as "propaganda"; dismissing differing opinions as "extremist"; dismissing differing opinions as "far left"; dismissing differing opinions as "yapping"; dismissing differing opinions as "unreasonable"; etc.
This seems like a “left has a reality bias” thing? These are current, factual events. Maybe they’re not being shared in right wing spaces, but these things are really happening.
Reddit subs sometimes don't match the content you'd expect from their name (some are very hard to decode for outsiders, e.g. femcelgrippysockjail, gangstalking etc). Perhaps pics was once just pretty landscape photography, but what happens with Reddit is that a sub will start to focus on one type of content that the hivemind wants and then the sub will fracture. You have to go find r/lovelylandscapes if that is what you want. It'll be there somewhere. You landed in the wrong sub.
That's not really the issue here. This strong political orientation is widespread across default subreddits including /r/news or /r/europe and affects the Home / front page.
The first has 300k users, while /r/pics sports 33M.
The second is for discussion rather than posting photos.
Good that you ask, because that's exactly what I get on X: after liking some photos, I see mostly photography in my feed.
This brings us back to the original topic here: this appears to work well on X, while it is Reddit that pushes politics into my feed via default subreddits.
With usage on a daily basis since GPT-4 I have not once encountered a scenario where I was concerned about the output being complex enough and a verbatim copy to warrant such concerns.
Generally it would seem statistically unlikely to reconstruct a copyrighted work, rather the output should be a probabilistic average. Snippets are typically too common and short to be protected by copyright. Copyright challenges are likely to fail on the "substantial similarity" test.
I understand plaintiffs would need to show that code is virtually identical, not just similar, and that these parts represent a "substantial" portion of the original work's creative value.
My argument would be that while some complexity remains, it might not require a large team of developers.
What previously needed five devs, might be doable by just two or three.
In the article, he says there are no shortcuts to this part of the job. That does not seem likely to be true. The research and thinking through the solution goes much faster using AI, compared to before where I had to look up everything.
In some cases, agentic AI tools are already able to ask the questions about architecture and edge cases, and you only need to select which option you want the agent to implement.
There are shortcuts.
Then the question becomes how large the productivity boost will be and whether the idea that demand will just scale with productivity is realistic.
The team behind Z-Image Turbo has told us multiple times in their paper that the output quality of the Turbo model is superior to the larger base model.
I think that information still did not get through to most users.
"Notably, the resulting distilled model not only matches the original multi-step teacher but even surpasses it in terms of photorealism and visual impact."
"It achieves 8-step inference that is not only indistinguishable from the 100-step teacher but frequently surpasses it in perceived quality and aesthetic appeal"
The man is officially a dear friend of Israel, he has never defended Hitler, he indeed supports the German far right party, his chatbot had an alignment issue that has been patched within 16 hours.
What you call a "Sieg heil" was an innocent hand gesture made once, and that hoax has been debunked by both the anti defamation league and the Israeli PM personally. You know this, yet you cannot let go of your hate.
I know you are not to be listened to when you dare say "innocent hand gesture made once", when he very clearly made it twice in a row; front, turn and repeat:
https://m.youtube.com/shorts/R_6dVlz6mug
That is there, recorded, and you are telling me to ignore what I see.
I know you won't care, this video is not for you, is there in case anyone else starts to belive your lies, they can see for themselves.
To me it looks like Musk is overly concerned about discrimination against whites as well as woke ideology, also out of personal experience with his child.
The rest, where progressives slander Musk and label him a Nazi or, their newest addition, a pedophile, appears to be a litany of lies, like the ones just shared above.
and Musk went further saying it's free speech and implying if you try do anything against it you are fascist
and you could check the Grok "~feed" and get tons over tons of examples of them _not_ doing anything. And if that changed, then it did very recently. I mean the UK is not the only country where the topic of regulating X to to them failing to self regulate and outright intentionally ignoring local laws was opened up. And as much as Musk might say he don't care and it's implied that the US will retaliate against any country which enforces actions against X for not complying with their law when doing business in their country, it still is a huge headache for X (company) and it's not like people in the US are supper happy about that either.
reply