Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | sudorank's commentslogin

I started to learn maths again in university. The library was a great place to learn the history of it (I started to get into the history of Encryption)

As for learning how to do stuff with maths. I'm a huge fan of being taught it - then again i'm the sort of learner who really gains when showed how to do something and then left to practice.


Whenever someone mentions "Christian" and "Science" within the same title they're wrong too.

This article sucks on so many levels.....


Anyone else look at the seats in the top picture and think "back trouble".

I couldn't imagine sitting in solid wooden chairs for 8 hours a day! The pain would be unbearable.


That's their cafeteria.


Thank god for that! :-)


Link to the original university conducting the research:

http://www.swansea.ac.uk/media-centre/latest-research/sheepd...


Ah okay, I might be in luck then because I do have some employment periods too.

Thanks.


Thanks, I did read about more "functional cv" types where you talked about your roles and responsibilities.

Sounds like a possible plan.

To be honest it's quite frightening writing a CV again! Haven't had to do it for a while!


Be careful with functional resumes. A lot of recruiters/hiring managers don't care for them. Myself included. They can work, but I also sometimes they can be used to 'hide' inexperience. Disclaimer: I don't do tech recruiting so take all of this with a grain of salt. I have reviewed resumes for technical/'social innovation' positions but I tend to focus more on non computery roles.

That being said, having a nice list of what your good at is great. Also I really recommend having a summary at the top that is almost like a mini cover letter. Target it towards the job you're applying for for example:

Sudorank is a developer with experience developing mid-sized systems in ruby on rails hooking into legacy COBOL backends. Lauded for his/her ability to mentally parse XML, he/she can manually code systems using a magnetic needle. Comfortable leading teams Sudorank has had experience working a variety of fields, from bio-med to lifestyle startups.

Keep in mind is that you want to save the recruiter/HM time. They might be looking at 100 of these. Lead with why you're kickass.

Another handy trick is keep a plan text version for if you end up applying through any automated systems. Source control is your friend here.


There's an enormous tension between CVs that are short and to-the-point and CVs that pass some kind of idiotic "weight" test. The solution is:

a) To be brief and to the point (and honest), and b) to put your stuff in reverse chronological order -- so the recent (and hopefully relevant) stuff is up top.

The rest of it is there in case there's a weight test, or for when the CV has been shortlisted and is being given a closer look.

Finally, you need to exercise judgment in how fine-grained you get with "projects". You don't want to give the impression you're padding or claiming credit for projects you had little hand in. (And consider tailoring your CV for the job. I do not always do this, but I always do it for jobs I really care about.)


I advocate people keep it up to date all the time - well, every 6-12 months. Spend 15-30 minutes adding achievements/projects on the resume when it's still relatively fresh in your mind, vs trying to remember stuff 5 years later.

If you have a habit of keeping a resume updated, and it's public, it's less of a signal to current employers as well too. I've heard many people say they don't ever want to public/post a resume because their current employer might find it. If you keep it public and posted all the time, as more of a "here's the great stuff I'm doing at XYZ", there's no 'signal' to be inferred.

That said, I know that wouldn't necessarily fly in ever industry, but... that's more social convention than anything else. If 90% of people behaved that way, that would be the 'new norm'.


Exactly, once they get these vehicles right accidents will be a pretty rare thing.

Until then it has to be a case of "tough" if you want to sue. The Victorians had the right attitude to future technology and it's something we need to get back to.


No, they had horrible workplace diseases and injuries and a dreadful attitude to health. If your business model includes telling potential litigants to man up, you're not going into space today.


Sounds interesting, might check it out tonight.


really do, I've found it's the easiest to use, and lightweight too.


I like keeping backups on a hard disk in the office. For a guy who grew up in the 90's there's something comforting about being able to physically look at one of your backup methods!


That's a great backup method, which is cheap and easy to recover. It's not very robust though. In the event of a natural disaster, your office is just as likely to be destroyed as your home. Ideally you would have an offsite backup (or two) in a completely different region.


The 'different region' requirement might just depend on different things:

- How far away are your office and home?

- What is your locality?

As an example, I don't live in a place prone to earthquakes or hurricanes, and my office is a 20 ~ 30 min drive from my home. What is the risk that both my office and home are destroyed?


It's all just a matter of risk management:

- Simply copying your data to a second hard drive in the same machine protects against hard drive failure.

- Second disconnected hard drive protects you from ransom-viruses and accidental erasures.

- Second disconnected hard drive on the other side of the house gives you some protection from a fire (caught early enough).

- Second disconnected hard drive in another building some distance away protects against small disasters (eg. randomly directed tornado).

- Second disconnected hard drive in another region protects against large disasters (eg. single nuclear strike).

- Second disconnected hard drive in another country protects against national disasters (eg. invasion, multiple nuclear strikes).

- Second disconnected hard drive on another continent protects against major disasters (eg. moderate asteroid impact event)

...and so on. But all of these can be protected against by simply having 3 backups.

Except bit rot. That shit's inevitable.


> - Second disconnected hard drive in another region protects against large disasters (eg. single nuclear strike).

> - Second disconnected hard drive in another country protects against national disasters (eg. invasion, multiple nuclear strikes).

> - Second disconnected hard drive on another continent protects against major disasters (eg. moderate asteroid impact event)

I'm not really sure if worrying about my hard drive will be something high on the priority list in many of these events.


If Toronto is hit by a devastating flood or winter storm, I think it's entirely likely that both your office and home could be impacted. That isn't nearly enough geographic separation to be disaster-ready. You really want to be on different coasts or continents.


Oh dear, if ever there was an example of Googles reach.....


I often wonder what would happen if one day google was just gone. I would imagine the internet would be in complete chaos.


The people who don't know what the address bar on their browser is would be in some serious trouble. (Not being a smarty pants. As someone who works with a lot of computer illiterates I've become painfully aware that there's a large user-base who don't know you can get somewhere on the internet without Google)


Only very briefly. There are good alternatives for everything Google does. In some cases, the alternatives are better.


perhaps a list of these good alternatives is in order?


nah, people would just google yahoo with bing.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: