Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | roydivision's commentslogin

More and more article titles follow this click bait pattern. The article itself is fine, interesting, albeit a bit short. But I totally agree, and it irks me too, that the implied promise of the title is not honored.


> roydivision SLAMS Popular Science magazine


It seems from my own upload that you are limited to one / email address. So yes you could just use a bunch of aliases, but I guess they're banking on most people only having access to a few addresses.


> More importantly, Docker containers themselves aren’t reproducible—running apt-get update or pip install requests at different times can yield different results, even with the same Dockerfile.

apt-get install <package name>=<version>

> And frankly, no one really needs Kubernetes, they just have it because everyone and their grandma has it. I digress, that’s a topic for another day.

Oh grow up, ffs.


> apt-get install <package name>=<version>

That's still not reproducible unless you use snapshot.debian.org or snapshot.ubuntu.com as upstream package index.


You can easily host and manage your own package repository. My point is that this apparent limitation is not in itself a strong enough reason to embark on NIX.

Go fill your boots if you want to use NIX, power to you, but be honest about why if you're going to write a piece about it.


> You can easily host and manage your own package repository.

Sure, it's not hard but it's work nonetheless, plus you'll incur the costs of maintaining that infrastructure indefinitely. Compare that to creating a Dockerfile which uses https://github.com/reproducible-containers/repro-sources-lis... to fully pin its package sources and calling it a day.


The Mastodon instance I'm on.


The article specifically states that this light is NOT visible to humans:

> UPE, also known as biophoton emission, is a spontaneous release of extremely low-intensity light that is invisible to the human eye and falls within the spectral range of 200–1,000 nm.


Light of those wavelenghts is not visible to humans.

Come on, this is mega basic ...


They actually are 380-750nm is the visible range. That said one lumen is approx 3.8×1015 photons and an LED bulb produces 75-110 lumens per watt. It seems like the original poster meant that we are not capable of detecting this with the naked eye even though it is theoretically in the right range.

https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/880/how-many-pho...

https://www.voltlighting.com/learn/lumens-to-watts-conversio...


Humans are able to see single photons, so your (and others') arguments don't hold substance.


I can turn out the light and not see my hand emitting light. Either a single photon isnt enough to be perceptible on average in real environments or something else is defective about the assumption for instance intervening tissue absorbing most or all photons involved.


Clarification,

First I wrote, "Light of those wavelenghts is not invisible to humans."

I wanted to change it to, "Light of those wavelenghts is visible to humans."

But I messed up and it says what it says now, can't edit it further but I meant the opposite thing.



Paul Fischer's book, 'A Kim Jong-Il Production' is well worth a read, not only for the story of these kidnappings, but of life in North Korea and its history.


I choose browser plugins instead for a more consistent experience, at home or anywhere.


I switched about two months ago, paid for a year. It's such a relief, it's like having search of ten years ago back again. It just works, and no useless crap. Options that make sense to ME, not to the profit line.

I'm now paying for:

- Search

- Email

- News

- Backups

Of course I'd rather not spend the money, but ALL these services are leagues ahead of the ad-supported alternatives. This is how the Internet should work.

(Edit - formatting)


A flawed solution looking for a problem.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: