Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | pests's commentslogin

Does amazon make an OS like Windows? Did Amazon wage a multi year long war against Linux and the open source philosophy in its history?

Linux for their respective cloud resources. Neither is intended to really be a public distro.

It's super weird people are bitter about things that happened almost two decades ago. Much less there was no war. I think Ballmer said some mean words about Linux and Microsoft sued Lindows for infringement and won. After the rename to Linspire Microsoft actually worked with them on compatibility. The whole Windows v Linux "war" is completely contrived by some fans of Linux as some holy war.

That completely glosses over the actual behaviour of Microsoft, and ignoring the kinds of career, business, project, and reputational damage those tactics did.

MS’s attacks on open source, open formats, and free software impacted and still impact democracies, developing nations, general computing capabilities, and create vast market inefficiencies. Looking at it as pure tech misses the forest for the trees. The corruption of the Office OpenXml process alone is a daily pox on the developing world. The tax impact of those entanglements is recurrent, and frequently hurts education and healthcare.

Also: if someone got burnt by some industry jerks and have had to deal with the fallout for decades, “it was 20 years ago” completely misstates the problem. Some BS was started 20 years ago, sure, but with daily crap-bowls that needed to be eaten every day in between. Entire careers have fallen into those cracks, armies of IT staff forced into suboptimal and broken workflows to satisfy decisions based on establishing and abusing monopolies.

Breaking a spine, even years and years ago, impacts the every day. Bitterness can be well deserved with an understanding of what was lost.


Didn't Microsoft throw SCO some bones to help sue linux vendors?

Heres a hasty link to an article about it https://www.techmonitor.ai/technology/microsoft_offered_to_u...


> Much less there was no war.

Did people pick up literal guns and fight each other with literal bullets over Linux/Microsoft?

No of course not. Even most American nerds aren't deranged.

Did Microsoft do everything it could to try and kill Linux, and the concept of OSS in general? You bet your fucking ass they did.

> Microsoft sued Lindows for infringement and won. After the rename to Linspire Microsoft actually worked with them on compatibility.

Holy revisionist history batman.

This isn't exactly fucking hard to find

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Microsoft_Corp._v._Lindows.com....

> As early as 2002, a court rejected Microsoft's claims, stating that Microsoft had used the term "windows" to describe graphical user interfaces before the product, Windows, was ever released, and the windowing technique had already been implemented by Xerox and Apple many years before.[4] Microsoft kept seeking retrial, but in February 2004, a judge rejected two of Microsoft's central claims.[5] The judge denied Microsoft's request for a preliminary injunction and raised "serious questions" about Microsoft's trademark. Microsoft feared a court may define "Windows" as generic and result in the loss of its status as a trademark.

> In July 2004, Microsoft offered to settle with Lindows.[6] As part of this licensing settlement, Microsoft paid an estimated US$20,000,000 (equivalent to $33,294,574 in 2024), and Lindows transferred the Lindows trademark to Microsoft and changed their name to Linspire.

> completely contrived by some fans of Linux

I mean there are absolutely some fanboy fantasies of grandeur here but I don't think it's the "fans of Linux" who are delusional mate.


No.

Amazon wasn’t even a twinkle in its father’s eye.


Not the best solution but you could turn off "Unknown tracker alerts" on your phone temporarily when you're driving your wife's car etc.

What are you trying to gain by this line of debate? That you don't use software made by Miguel?

Okay cool, congrats.


Look at his comments in this thread. He's being a troll.

The news only dropped about 5 days ago about the US partnership. Its still a Chinese app. Now the deal with Oracle will have them designing the algo, storing US users data, and doing US moderation. It wasn't this way before.

Nah, the writing is on the wall for a long time and they nearly got shut down several times. I can’t imagine that the permission to continue operations came without major concessions.

no, it is an American company with Americans holding 80% ownership.

> you don't get in a mass-produced product.

But you are trying to reproduce a mass-produced product.


I'm merely making the point that there's nothing magical about the recipe. Anyone wanting to truly replicate it for mass production can simply use commodity flavor compounds.

I do recall some episode of "How its made" or similar of a food factory discussing some mix they were doing for a fast food chain, IIRC, that involved "two separate bags of spices, each sourced from a separate supplier for secrecy". That's about the level I'd expect out of such a scheme.

I'm sorry, is this an in-joke or satire or something? I can't tell really. Maybe a woosh moment, and as others have said, the GP/person you are speaking about, Walter Bright, is the creator of the D language. Maybe you didn't read your parent's post? Not saying its intentional, but it almost seems rude to keep speaking in that way about someone present in the conversation.

> But unless they've made a commitment not to prompt the agent again

Model UI's like Gemini have "scheduled actions" so in the initial prompt you could have it do things daily and send updates or reports, etc, and it will start the conversation with you. I don't think its powerful enough to say spawn sub agents but there is some ability for them to "start chats".


I was curious and don't know enough of the cloud internals so asked an LLM:

Cloud A: AWS (Amazon Web Services)

Cloud B: Azure (Microsoft Azure)

Cloud C: GCP (Google Cloud Platform)

Cloud D: OCI (Oracle Cloud Infrastructure)

Gemini had some decent evidence for each choice too, but I didn't confirm anything.


Would you like to share that evidence?



wouldn't they run on neoclouds? paying AWS for GPUs is shooting yourself in the foot money-wise

> What could possibly be the point of posting such a sign?

If you want a real answer, its increased penalties / extra charges if caught in the "zone".


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: