Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | frez1's commentslogin

what i enjoy the most is every "AI will replace engineers" article is written by an employee working at an AI company with testimonials from other people also working at AI companies


The way things usually gain traction is when a big tech company has success experimenting with it. it happened with node way back and happening with rust now.

the fact we haven't heard much about was use is probably because it isnt as valuable as we think, or no one has played around with it yet to find out


> when a big tech company has success experimenting with it

TFA has many examples of big tech companies using Wasm in production. It's not exhaustive either, e.g. the article doesn't mention:

- Google using it as a backend for Flutter and to implement parts of Google Maps, Earth, Meet, Sheets, Keep, YouTube, etc

- Microsoft using it in Copilot Studio

- eBay using it in their mobile app

- MongoDB using it for Compass

- Amazon supporting it in EKS

- 1Password using it in their browser extension

- Unity having it as a build target

(And this was just what I found with some quick web searches; I'm sure there are many other examples.)

---

> the fact we haven't heard much about was use is probably because it isnt as valuable as we think

One of the conclusions of the article is that it's mostly used in ways that aren't very visible.


It sounds like the author and their team were more comfortable with node.js than python. they acknowledge fastapi was a good alternative that could solve their issues and allow some code reuse, but decided not to because they just wanted to use node.

the gist of this blog post is this company knew and understood node better than python, so they migrated to what they knew.


The idea is to keep your mind clear on what the priority is. If you didn't write many lines of code but still solved problems, you did your job. The two aren't mutually exclusive, but it helps in prioritization


I mean I can subscribe to 5 different streaming services and pay $50-60/mo, and how far away are we from having a service that provides a collection of streaming services (i.e. cable TV).

The problem that's happening lately is that streaming services were a way to get away from the expensiveness of cable, but now we're returning the the exact same problem we had then.


yeah the Australian Netflix at least has a very fragmented selection nowadays. The only things that keep my interest are really their originals.

I think Stan has most of the more well known shows these days, and I think it's better value for money than Netflix


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: