A few times in my life I have found job opportunities that would have been my dreamjob and I was uniquely qualified due to a cross-disciplinary background, previous experience and education, language skills and such. I was an SME with technical skills and I had so much knowledge of the company's products, industry and competitors that I could have done their marketing strategy and product strategy in a couple of weeks. Maybe it wouldn't all have been correct from the start, but I had so much knowledge that I could have done this by heart.
I spent a lot of time on targeted applications for these places, re-doing my CV and spending weeks iterating on my cover letter. I never heard back from any of those places.
Instead I've been hired into industries I knew nothing about. Sure, I was a decent candidate, but I was just another candidate. This has worked out fine.
Why did these places hire me and not the others? Because they were growing so they had a need to hire. The former places did not.
So for me the only real advice is to apply to places that are growing. When places are growing and really need to hire to expand, all the bullshit in the process is eliminated. Decisions are made fast. It's easier and more pleasant.
> So for me the only real advice is to apply to places that are growing.
Or sometimes when people are leaving and they need a replacement ASAP. That's how I was hired, but it was also quite lucky that there were not many applicants.
1)I need things, unless you want a naked homeless woman without a laptop to apply to your startup
2)Great, still have no job experience or degree
3)I sell everything and show up to the valley naked. I'm suddenly homeless looking for a job in a place where I have no connections, no degree, and no laptop to actually apply for a job or do remote gigs
4)AI startups number 1-4 are doomed to fail, 5 and 6 expect me to work 12 hour days with little pay and no benefits, and 7-9 won't hire me without a degree or nepotism
5)In the extremely unlikely chance I get hired given the circumstances described, I'll be laid off when the company goes belly up or the shareholders demand a new yacht
> expect me to work 12 hour days with little pay and no benefits
This is not how it should be, but sometimes when you have no other opportunities this is what you need to do to open doors.
Capitalism is vicious and not participating because you (rightfully) find it demeaning is your prerogative, but it is also poor local optimization.
I joined the military and walked with PTSD not because I’m a patriot but because I needed to pay for college. I got out and took an internship well below the poverty line. I turned that into an entry level job, climbed the ladder to build a cushion. Started several side businesses trying to improve my lot. One was successful enough now I can live a comfortable life.
The world sucks but you’ll be eaten alive if you wait for it to become fair. Some obstacles are stepping stones.
Plenty of people do this. Go to New York, SF or LA and you literally can't get a cup of coffee without running into someone that is stuck in a dead end service job, often for years, because they tried what you suggest.
Take risks, sure, but step 0 is have a resourced backup plan, and know when to execute it.
Loads of people do this! It's a big part of why accommodation is so expensive in major cities! It's just that it requires capital upfront, many have a degree filter, and it's still easy for the number of young people to outpace the available jobs.
Love the UI. I think these browser-based products are great at removing the "mystery" around music making or DJing by making it accessible. All you need to do is type a URL and click a few elements to get started and you get instant feedback. I built a similar browser app but for DJing (I was also inspired by Pocket Operators): https://dj.t-tunes.com/
I am building tinytunes as a lightweight, in-browser music player for YouTube and local music, in large part because YouTube has a better library of music than Spotify, but a bad UI for a music player: https://dj.t-tunes.com/
A dedicated music player and music recommendations is coming later ; this is a combined DJ controller + music player that lets you import local tracks and youtube playlists
I've recently gone from 60hz to 240hz to 480hz. Refresh rate in games is not just about what it looks like. It completely changes game mechanics, like movement, recoil etc. It is such a big difference between 60hz and 240hz that you're not really playing the same game. There are things you can do at 240hz that are impossible at 60hz. At 480hz, there's also so much more time to react, so you really don't need fast reflexes to take advantage of it.
I'm guessing you play FPS competitively and are in your 20s, and for you it might be true, I won't argue that.
The issue for me is that even if your experience was true for all gamers in the world, that would still be a tiny minority compared to all people in the world who use monitors to read text, day in and day out.
A low-res monitor cannot show a high-res image, but a high-res monitor can show a low-res picture, so both sides can get what they want here.
I run 8k/60 but my screen can also do 4k/120. If it could also do 1440 at 240hz or 1080 at 480hz wouldn't bother me, but that the industry spends all effort on making 1080/480 and basically NO effort on 8k does.
The industry should throw everything below say 200ppi on the scrap-heap of history where it belongs. It would harm nobody and benefit everybody.
Right, that should be imperceptible. The 240hz monitor was also 15" while the 480hz monitor is 27". I'm sure that contributes as well. My subjective experience is that I now just have a lot of more time to react.
The prompt the user enters is actually not the prompt. Most agents will have an additional background step to use the user's prompt to generate the actual, detailed instructions, which is then used as the actual prompt for code generation. That's how the ability to build a website from "create a website that looks like twitter" is achieved.
This is a very cool UI. Unfortunately I'm getting a lot of static and crackling during playback. Are you using WebAudio? I had similar issues before with https://dj.t-tunes.com/ but was able to mostly fix it, as long as gain is not manipulated.
I agree that assisted engineering means that software development goes from artisanal work modes to industrialized modes of work. Automotive engineers don't go to the factory and build the cars after they've designed them, but software engineers have been doing so. However, I have to say that the post doesn't really explain how you are industrialising code, and I don't really know what differentiates your product.
What we want as developers: To be able to implement functionality that utilizes a model for tasks like OCR, visual input and analysis, search or re-ranking etc, without having to implement an LLM API and pay for it. Instead we'd like to offer the functionality to users, possibly at no cost, and use their edge computing capacity to achieve it, by calling local protocols and models.
What we want as users: To have advanced functionality without having to pay for a model or API and having to auth it with every app we're using. We also want to keep data on our devices.
What trainers of small models want: A way for users to get their models on their devices, and potentially pay for advanced, specialized and highly performant on-device models, instead of APIs.
What seems to be delivered by NPUs at this point: filtering background noise from our microphone and blurring our camera using a watt or two less than before.
If you do video calls for 7 hours a day and then ran out it means you could have maybe ~7.5 hours. Not nothing, but differences in things like screen backlight and other component efficiency still dominate battery interests over whether there is an NPU or not. If you don't spend your day on video calls it's more like a 0% increase (mic noise processing is much lower load).
Regardless if it does zilch or some minor good for you in the battery respect, the point was more NPUs don't deliver on the above reasons everyone was supposed to want AI for. Most likely, IMO, because they are far too weak to do so and making them powerful takes too much power+cost.
I believe iOS and macOS make good use for NPUs, actually, with automatic OCRing on any photo displayed, be it in browser or Photos app. You can select any text easily and quickly.
You cannot buy these. You can only buy companies listed in Shanghai and Shenzhen that are enrolled in Stock Connect, which has certain requirements that means these small IPOd companies cannot be enrolled. It is possible that there mutual funds or ETFs in HK that are available, and hold these types of companies.
I spent a lot of time on targeted applications for these places, re-doing my CV and spending weeks iterating on my cover letter. I never heard back from any of those places.
Instead I've been hired into industries I knew nothing about. Sure, I was a decent candidate, but I was just another candidate. This has worked out fine.
Why did these places hire me and not the others? Because they were growing so they had a need to hire. The former places did not.
So for me the only real advice is to apply to places that are growing. When places are growing and really need to hire to expand, all the bullshit in the process is eliminated. Decisions are made fast. It's easier and more pleasant.
reply