GPT works based on tokens, not characters.

Plugging is okay, but you should always disclose if you are involved (which appears to be the case here based on your username).

Their username is in the repository name, that seems pretty clear to me...

Twitter's visibility filtering wasn't based on "Your" User Behavior. It was based on what their moderation team decided to filter or not filter.

Sure, there was human involvement. Seems irrelevant to the comment I was responding to - Twitter did not hide that they were deranking some Tweets and there doesn't seem to be any difference between their current policy 'revealed' in the Twitter Files and what Elon proposed.

[2] is referring to 1inch offering 8.05% APY on the 1inch token _only_, which is easy when only 621m out of 1.5b tokens are circulating (i.e. more 1inch tokens are printed to pay the fake interest).

I think you need to work on iOS support, or this will not take off.

P.S. Beautiful project for a problem that definitely needs solving.

Thanks! We're thinking through the right architecture; it's a question of whether WebKit will get Insertable Streams soon enough, or if we'll need to create a custom client. Our preference is for users to not need a custom client, because that's one more piece of software they need to keep up to date.

Why not implement the tried and true fingerprint verification? Quite easy to do when you're having synchronous, lively video/audio conversations.

That's what we'll be doing for a well-defined group of users -- that is, with stable, long-term cryptographic identities. It's not as useful for conversations where participants join with a link.

'Hide' takes one click :)

They absolutely didn't pay list price. Even the rookiest AWS account manager is going to be able to get a discount on $600k of compute.

You can get up to $100k in startup credits on AWS just by asking. They certainly cut a deal for Stable Diffusion on top of that.

The trouble isn't renting those GPUs but it was finding that number of GPUs closely connected to each other for the duration of the training process.

The founder said that this is not quite as possible with most public clouds and that it is easier to buy the GPUs.

No, it won't. A single miner has chosen to *not include* TC transactions in their blocks, but they are not *censoring* TC transactions in the sense that they will validly build upon blocks built by others that feature TC transactions.

As long as 1% of miners include TC transactions, even if 99% choose to not include, TC transactions will still be part of the blockchain, albeit not as timely.

When miners start actively REFUSING to build on blocks that feature TC problems, that is an issue.

For what it's worth, the ethereum development community is actively exploring features that make active censorship a network violation (with censored blocks not being accepted by the network), although this is an area of active research.

Current proposals include PBS+crList.

It's also as simple as paying the appropriate fees for including this transaction... everyone has a price, even (especially) miners.

Can you point me at the relevant discussions for this (exploring features to prevent censorship).

It’s an interesting area…

Is there really great marketplace demand? The hacker/hobbyist community is tiny.

For what is worth my opinion, I wouldn't get one even if it was free.

The first data I look for when I read these enthusiastic reports of color e-paper screen is the refresh rate, and every single time the results are discouraging: 15 seconds for refreshing a page make the product nearly useless for almost all purposes except maybe calendars, but the inferior graphics quality and higher cost make them a lot less appealing than for example using a normal LED screen plus a PIR sensor that turns it off and sends the CPU to sleep when nobody is around to save power. I think the technology just isn't there yet, and will probably need a long time before it becomes interesting for practical uses beyond tinkering and research.

I agree, and it’s frustrating how refresh rate is often buried in the specs.

If you haven’t seen it, here [0] is a monochrome e-ink monitor that you can actually watch videos on, just about. For working with documents it looks totally viable. It seems they are only available in China though.

[0] https://youtube.com/watch?v=iMA8masxYco (skip to 13:30 to see e-ink video playback)

Very interesting product, thanks for the link; might be a godsend for long text sessions (coders, writers, journalists, etc). Price still high for most potential users however.